Supreme Court's February 2026 Remarks on RERA: What Bangalore Home Buyers Should Do

On 12 February 2026, the Supreme Court said in open court that the real estate regulatory authorities were doing little beyond helping builders in default. The remark was widely reported, and many home buyers read it as a sign that RERA no longer protects them. This article explains what the court said and what it decided, what stays unchanged in the law, and the checks that protect a buyer in Bangalore before any money is paid.
What the Supreme Court Said
The remarks came from a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. The case was State of Himachal Pradesh v. Naresh Sharma, and it had nothing to do with a housing project. Himachal Pradesh wanted to move its RERA office from Shimla to Dharamshala, and the High Court had stayed that move.
During the hearing, the Chief Justice spoke about the authorities in general. The main points of what he said are listed below:
- It is high time that all the states revisit and rethink constituting this authority.
- Except for facilitating builders in default, the institution is doing nothing, and it would be better to abolish it.
- The people for whom the institution was created are depressed, disgusted and disappointed.
The same judge had spoken in a similar way earlier. In September 2024, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan remarked that RERA had become a rehabilitation centre for former bureaucrats. That comment was also made orally, in a case about a different subject.
What the Court Decided
The order of 12 February 2026 dealt only with the office in Himachal Pradesh. The court allowed the state to shift the RERA office to Dharamshala, subject to the outcome of the case pending in the High Court. It also moved the appellate powers to the principal district judge at Dharamshala, so that people affected by RERA orders are not put to trouble.
The comments on RERA were oral observations made during the hearing. They are not a ruling on the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, and they do not bind any authority. The court did not strike down any section, and it did not direct any state to close its authority.
What Stays the Same for Karnataka Buyers
The Act is in force exactly as before, and Karnataka RERA continues to register projects and hear complaints. Every protection written into the Act still applies to a home booked in Bangalore. The main ones are listed below:
- A promoter must deposit 70% of the money collected from buyers in a separate bank account, to be used only for land and construction cost of that project.
- A promoter may take up to 10% of the cost as advance before a written agreement for sale is signed and registered.
- The project record on the RERA portal must be updated every quarter, including the homes booked.
- A buyer whose home is delayed may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay.
- A promoter who ignores an order of the authority faces a daily penalty that may add up to 5% of the estimated project cost.
These rights are real, and many Karnataka buyers have won orders under them. The court's remarks are about a different stage, which is what happens after the order is passed.
Where the System Falls Short
The gap that the court pointed to is enforcement. The Act asks the authority to dispose of a matter within 60 days, or to record its reasons for taking longer. Complaints in practice run well beyond that period, and an order on paper is only the first step.
When a builder does not pay, the Act treats the amount as an arrear of land revenue. In Karnataka, the authority issues a recovery certificate and the revenue officials of the district have to collect the money. The process is slow, and a builder with few assets in its own name is hard to recover from.
Buyers have had to go to court to get the certificates acted upon. On 27 April 2026, the Karnataka High Court directed the authorities to execute a set of RERA recovery certificates within eight weeks. The case, Rajesh Rao C.V. v. State of Karnataka, shows that a second round of litigation is sometimes needed after winning the first.
The makeup of the authorities is the other criticism. The Act calls for a chairperson with at least 20 years of professional experience and members with at least 15 years. The fields it lists include housing, law, economics, planning and public administration. The comment of 2024 was aimed at how often retired officials fill these posts.
Checks That Work Before the Money Is Paid
A refund order that takes years to collect is a poor substitute for a home delivered on time. The practical lesson from the remarks is to treat the RERA number as the first check and not the last. The checks below are done before booking, when the buyer still holds the money:
- The developer's record on the Karnataka RERA portal: earlier projects, their completion dates, extensions taken and complaints filed.
- The quarterly updates of the project, to see whether construction keeps pace with the money collected.
- The stage of construction, since a project close to completion carries less delivery risk than one at the foundation stage.
- The payment plan, which should follow construction milestones and not calendar dates.
- The bank that funds the project and the banks that have approved it for home loans.
- The title documents, the sanctioned plan and the land conversion, read by an independent lawyer.
- The possession date and the delay interest clause written in the agreement for sale.
A buyer who wants the least exposure to delay picks a completed project with an occupancy certificate. The price is usually higher than for a home still being built, but the building is there to inspect. A buyer who picks an under-construction home gets more choice and more time to pay, and takes on the wait.
Steps After Booking
The checks do not end with the booking. A few habits make any later claim far stronger, and they are listed below:
- Pay only into the project account named in the RERA record, and keep every receipt.
- Register the agreement for sale before paying more than 10% of the cost.
- Read the quarterly update each time it is filed, and compare it with the site.
- Put every delay or change of plan in writing to the promoter, by email or letter.
- File the complaint without a long wait once the possession date in the agreement has passed.
Buyers in a delayed project gain from acting together through an association of allottees. A group shares the cost of a lawyer and carries more weight before the authority and the revenue officials. The association also has the right to take over the common areas once the project is complete.
What May Change Next
The remarks have added to the calls for stronger recovery powers and faster hearings. Any change to the Act has to come from Parliament, and changes to the Karnataka rules have to come from the state government. As of October 2026, the Act and the Karnataka rules read as they did before the remarks, so buyers should plan around the law as it is today.


